(Dis)engaging with race theory: Feminist philosophy's debate on "transracialism" as a case study
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-2018
Publication Title
Philosophy Today
Abstract
Rebecca Tuvel's controversial "In Defense of Transracialism" has been criticized for a lack of engagement with critical race theory. Disengagement with salient material on race is a consistent feature of the philosophical conversation out of which it arises. In this article, I trace the origins of feminist philosophy's disengaged and distorted view of "transracialism" and racial passing through the work of Janice Raymond, Christine Overall, and Cressida Heyes, and consider some of the relevant work on passing that is omitted in the philosophy of "transracialism." Finally, I offer methodological suggestions to avoid such distortions and omissions in feminist philosophy.
Volume Number
62
Issue Number
1
First Page
31
Last Page
50
DOI
10.5840/philtoday2018215199
Recommended Citation
Hom, . (2018-12-01). (Dis)engaging with race theory: Feminist philosophy's debate on "transracialism" as a case study. Philosophy Today, 62(1), 31-50.