Event Title

Differences in Student Performance on Matching Selected Response and Fill-in-the-Blank Constructed Response Assessment Questions

Presenter Information

Samantha Castagna

Faculty Mentor

Miriam Jordan

Keywords

Miriam Jordan

Abstract

Student test assessment varieties range from detailed constructed response items to simple multiple choice questions. Researchers often wonder which method is a more efficient means of questioning students. The ultimate assessment goal is to compose questions and prompts that provide students with an opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge. Accurate measurement of student knowledge is often sacrificed for the sake of time efficiency. By using nearly identical questions, this study investigates whether or not fill-in-the-blank and matching questions can be accurate measurements of knowledge as well as time efficient. It seeks to go beyond the mere averaging of test scores and further on to understand any differences or correlations in scores between the two formats.

Session Name:

Education: Teaching and Learning II

Start Date

4-4-2014 10:15 AM

End Date

4-4-2014 11:15 AM

Location

HSB 105

This document is currently not available here.

Share

Import Event to Google Calendar

COinS
 
Apr 4th, 10:15 AM Apr 4th, 11:15 AM

Differences in Student Performance on Matching Selected Response and Fill-in-the-Blank Constructed Response Assessment Questions

HSB 105

Student test assessment varieties range from detailed constructed response items to simple multiple choice questions. Researchers often wonder which method is a more efficient means of questioning students. The ultimate assessment goal is to compose questions and prompts that provide students with an opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge. Accurate measurement of student knowledge is often sacrificed for the sake of time efficiency. By using nearly identical questions, this study investigates whether or not fill-in-the-blank and matching questions can be accurate measurements of knowledge as well as time efficient. It seeks to go beyond the mere averaging of test scores and further on to understand any differences or correlations in scores between the two formats.